top of page

A decline in the reading of classical literature

  • Writer: Matthew Parish
    Matthew Parish
  • 1 hour ago
  • 3 min read
ree

There is much anecdotal and statistical evidence to suggest that people do indeed read fewer books than they once did, and particularly fewer works of classical literature. Book sales statistics in most Western countries have remained roughly stable in volume, but this disguises a profound shift in what is being read. Modern fiction, celebrity memoirs and self-help books dominate sales, while the great works of Homer, Shakespeare, Dickens or Tolstoy languish on the shelves. Surveys of reading habits amongst young adults in Europe and North America suggest a steady decline in the proportion who read any book of classical literature after leaving school. The question is not merely one of taste, but of time, culture and technology.


The most obvious cause is the transformation of attention wrought by digital media. The internet, and particularly social media, has fragmented attention spans into bursts of a few seconds. Classical literature demands concentration, patience and imaginative immersion. A reader must learn to visualise complex scenes, interpret archaic vocabulary and follow intricate arguments or plots. These are slow and reflective skills, cultivated by practice. Modern entertainment, by contrast, rewards speed and novelty. The constant flow of images and videos provides instant emotional gratification, leaving little appetite for the sustained mental effort that reading Tolstoy or Proust requires. In this sense, the decline of classical reading is part of a broader social shift from depth to immediacy.


Education systems have also contributed to this change. Where once the study of canonical literature was central to secondary and university curricula, many institutions have abandoned strict literary canons in favour of cultural relativism or contemporary relevance. Students are encouraged to study modern genres, graphic novels or film as equal to traditional prose. The argument for inclusivity and diversity in syllabuses has merit, yet it has also eroded the shared cultural reference points that classical literature provided. A person who had read Homer, Virgil and Shakespeare once shared a vocabulary of metaphor and moral reflection with others across nations and generations. Without that common foundation, public discourse risks becoming thinner, its language less precise and its moral imagination less rich.


Economic and social pressures also play their part. Working hours are long, leisure time is short, and the cost of living drives people towards quick relaxation rather than intellectual exertion. Reading a classic is often seen as a luxury for those with time and education to spare. The growth of audiobooks and summaries may alleviate this slightly, but they cannot replicate the deep cognitive engagement that silent reading promotes. Nor can they convey the subtle rhythms of great prose or the internal dialogues that reading slowly tends to awaken.


The consequences for society are subtle yet profound. When fewer people read classical literature, societies lose not merely their cultural heritage but also a vital means of moral and emotional education. The great works of the past are repositories of human experience: they teach empathy, ambiguity and the tragic limits of human action. A citizenry nourished upon Homer, Sophocles, Dante or Austen is more likely to understand complexity and moral nuance. In contrast, a society sustained upon headlines and social media posts risks collapsing into binary thinking and emotional immediacy. The ability to read deeply is intimately connected to the ability to think critically, to reason with care, and to empathise with others unlike oneself.


Nevertheless the decline of classical reading is not irreversible. Digital tools that currently distract could also serve to revive interest, by offering annotated editions, accessible translations and online reading communities. The enduring popularity of adaptations of classical stories—whether on stage, film or television—shows that their themes still speak to modern audiences. What is required is an effort, both educational and cultural, to remind people that the rewards of deep reading are not merely aesthetic but moral and civic. A society that ceases to read its classics risks forgetting how to understand itself; for the great books of the past are mirrors in which humanity has long seen its own face.

 
 

Note from Matthew Parish, Editor-in-Chief. The Lviv Herald is a unique and independent source of analytical journalism about the war in Ukraine and its aftermath, and all the geopolitical and diplomatic consequences of the war as well as the tremendous advances in military technology the war has yielded. To achieve this independence, we rely exclusively on donations. Please donate if you can, either with the buttons at the top of this page or become a subscriber via www.patreon.com/lvivherald.

Copyright (c) Lviv Herald 2024-25. All rights reserved.  Accredited by the Armed Forces of Ukraine after approval by the State Security Service of Ukraine. To view our policy on the anonymity of authors, please click the "About" page.

bottom of page