Monday 6 April 2026 The question of whether the United States risks running out of missiles and other ordnance in her war against Iran is, at first glance, an implausible one. She remains the most heavily armed state in human history, with a defence budget that dwarfs that of any conceivable adversary and a global network of industrial partners capable, in theory, of sustaining prolonged conflict. Yet wars are not fought in theory. They are fought in time, under conditions of

Saturday 4 April 2026 The collapse of negotiations between the United States and Iran in early 2026 was not the result of a single failure, nor even a single miscalculation. It was rather the culmination of structural mistrust, incompatible strategic objectives and, critically, the appointment of negotiators whose authority outstripped their expertise. The transition from fragile diplomacy to open conflict occurred with alarming haste — yet its origins lay in months, even yea

Saturday 4 April 2026 In recent months the character of the war in Ukraine has exhibited a striking asymmetry — a battlefield largely frozen in place, yet skies increasingly alive with violence. While trench lines in the Donbas shift only marginally, and in some sectors have even begun to move in Ukraine’s favour, the tempo of Russian strikes against civilian population centres and critical infrastructure has intensified. This divergence between front-line stagnation and rear

Saturday 4 April 2026 The dismissal of senior military officers in times of mounting international tension is an act that reverberates far beyond the confines of bureaucratic reshuffling. It speaks to questions of trust, ideology and the relationship between political authority and military professionalism. Recent reports concerning the actions of Pete Hegseth, in advocating or supporting the removal of senior officers within the United States military establishment, invite c

Friday 3 April 2026 Recently Donald Trump has publicly dismissed Britain’s aircraft carriers as “toys” compared to those of the United States Navy. The remarks, made in the context of disagreements over the Middle East conflict and Anglo-American burden-sharing, have revived a perennial question in naval strategy: what, precisely, constitutes the “quality” of an aircraft carrier? The answer, as ever in military affairs, lies not in rhetoric but in doctrine, design and purpose

Friday 3 April 2026 There is a persistent tendency, in moments of technological transformation, to imagine that something fundamentally unprecedented has arrived — that the old rules no longer apply, that the structures of governance must either collapse or be reborn in entirely novel forms. Artificial intelligence, in its current phase of rapid development and deployment, has attracted precisely this kind of rhetoric. It is described as a revolutionary force, a disruptive in